Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Little understanding of RTI Act affecting functioning in UP

 

Little understanding of RTI Act affecting functioning in UP

 
LUCKNOW: RTI activists from all over the state have come together to highlight the plight of the RTI users and the failure of the RTI infrastructure in Uttar Pradesh. The activists have launched a signature campaign to mop up public opinion on the half-hearted implementation of the Act in the state.
The campaign which was launched on Monday has got more than 100 signatures of RTI users from the city. The users have also shared their experiences, and want the implementing authorities to act and remove the anomalies, most of which are because of the little understanding of the Act among the government officers. One of the users said that the public information officer, who had demanded extra fee (as per the Act) from the user to provide the information, did not know where the additional fee has to be deposited.
The lesser understanding of the Act is a roadblock in timely disposal of RTI matters. Another user has raised a point about the appointment of the first appeals' authority in the government departments. Many of the departments have the same officer working as the Public Information officer (PIO) and the first appellate authority. The wrong appointments affect the functioning under the RTI Act.
At the end of the campaign, the public opinion will be submitted to the governor, chief minister and the leader of the opposition. "We have already submitted our charter of demands to the Raj Bhawan today," said activist Urvashi Sharma. The RTI Act came into effect on September 14, 2005. It was on March 22, 2006 that the UP State Information Commission (UPSIC) started functioning. The commission, since then, has got a huge pendency of RTI applications to clear.
Apart from gathering public opinion on the state of RTI affairs in UP, activists have also drafted a nine-point charter of demands to be submitted to the Governor, CM and leader of the opposition. The demands include transparency in appointment of information commissioners, quick disposal of pending RTI cases, speedy and full recovery of fine imposed on government departments for not providing information, at least 50% representation of social workers in the state level committee constituted under the chief secretary for effective implementation of RTI Act and protection of RTI users and activists, especially those seeking sensitive information.
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment