http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/-/-----/articleshow/19743743.cms अखिलेश के मंत्री अब आरटीआई की सूचना के फेर में फंसे आईएएनएस | Apr 26, 2013, 08.02PM IST लखनऊ।। अखिलेश सरकार के मंत्रियों की बेलगाम जुबान को लेकर विरोधी दल जहां सरकार पर हमलावर रवैया अपनाए हुए हैं, वहीं अब सामाजिक संगठनों से जुड़े लोग भी कानूनी रूप से सरकार की घेराबंदी में जुट गए हैं। आरटीआई कार्यकर्ता उर्वशी शर्मा ने मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय से राज्य सरकार के कई मंत्रियों के ऐसे ही विवादित और कानून को खुली चुनौती देते हुए दिए गए मामलों में दर्ज एफआईआर की जानकारी सूचना के अधिकार के तहत मांगी है। राज्य के स्वास्थ्य मंत्री अहमद हसन ने मुरादाबाद में अपने भाषण में पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री मायावती पर सार्वजानिक रूप से जातिसूचक शब्द के साथ कटाक्ष किया था। अहमद हसन ने आरोप लगाया था कि विरोध न करने पर एक जाति विशेष के लोगों को ही प्रमोशन का लाभ मिलता। [ जारी है ] उर्वशी ने कहा है कि अहमद हसन का यह कृत्य महिलाओं व अनुसूचित जाति के प्रति उनकी कुत्सित मानसिकता को सिद्ध करता है। उर्वशी ने अहमद हसन के विरुद्ध अनुसूचित जाति एवं जनजाति (अत्याचार निवारण) अधिनियम, महिला उत्पीड़न एवं भारतीय दंड संहिता की सुसंगत धाराओं में उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा दर्ज कराई गयी प्रथम सूचना रिपोर्ट की सत्यापित प्रति मांगी है। इसी तरह एक अन्य मंत्री शिव कुमार बेरिया द्वारा एटा में एक कार्यक्रम के दौरान प्रशासनिक अधिकारियों एवं पुलिस वालों को सरेआम धमकी देने और सार्वजानिक रूप से अपमान करने के मामले में भी प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा कराई गई जांच रिपोर्ट मांगी गई है। सांडी विधायक राजेश्वरी देवी ने तो समाजवादी पार्टी सरकार के एक साल पूरे होने पर मनाए जा रहे उपलब्धि दिवस पर कार्यकताओं को अधिकारियों को सुधारने के लिए हाथ में चप्पल उठाने की जरूरत की नसीहत दे डाली। उर्वशी ने मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय से कहा है कि इस मामले में उस शासनादेश, अधिसूचना, नियम आदि की सत्यापित प्रति उन्हें मुहैया कराई जाए जिसके तहत एक विधायक अधिकारियों को चप्पल से मारने के लिए अधिकृत हैं। उन्होंने इस मामले में जांच और उसकी रिपोर्ट की प्रति भी मांगी है। मंत्री राम मूर्ति वर्मा के बयान, 'उत्तर प्रदेश में अपराध को कोई भी ताकत नहीं रोक सकती।' को आधार बनाते हुए उर्वशी ने प्रदेश में अपराध को रोकने के लिए राज्य सरकार द्वारा 1 अप्रैल 12 से 24 अप्रैल 13 तक की अवधि में जारी किए गए शासनादेशों की सत्यापित प्रतियां दिए जाने का अनुरोध किया है। इसी तरह पूर्व खादी एवं ग्रामोद्योग मंत्री राजाराम पांडेय को मंत्री पद से बर्खास्त किए जाने के प्रकरण से संबंधित पत्रावलियों की प्रति मांगी है। गौरतलब है कि पांडेय ने प्रतापगढ़ में कहा था कि बेल्हा की सड़कें हेमा मालिनी के गालों की तरह चमकेंगी, अभी तो फेशियल हो रहा है। इससे पहले वह सुल्तानपुर की डीएम धनलक्ष्मी की खूबसूरती की सार्वजनिक रूप से तारीफ करने के कारण विवादों में आए थे।

MoF refuses to make commissioning letter for black money study public

The Union finance ministry has refused to make public the order for commissioning a study to find out the quantum of black money floating in the economy, saying it would be a breach of parliamentary privileges. Admitting that it does not have any "exact estimate" of black money which is in circulation inside the country or abroad, the ministry said it had commissioned a study to estimate the quantum of unaccounted income/wealth inside and outside the country and its ramifications on national security. This was done on the basis of recommendations of Parliament's standing committee on finance. Responding to an RTI application seeking the order through which..................................................................................................................................... read full story at given link http://upcpri.blogspot.in/2013/04/mof-refuses-to-make-commissioning.html

Why Akhilesh Yadav is showing special affection towards tainted IAS Sadakant ?

Lucknow: The Samajwadi Party government in Uttar Pradesh has always been cornered by political parties for failing to control law and order situation in the state and before the 2012 Assembly polls when exit polls predicted the comeback of the party again it was the same issue which was raised. However, when the party stormed back to the power in the 2012 assembly polls, the government claimed to have tightened the noose of the miscreants and alleged party workers but again failed to deliver on this front. The game of crowning of the tainted minister and then shunting them out to garner support and earn repute in the eye of the public, was already being played, meanwhile, one more game plan was introduced; it was reinstating the tainting official, last week in a major administrative reshuffle, Sadakant Shukla was again handed the charge of the department which saw him shunted to Central Home Ministry for dubious work. Sadakant was sent back to the state before the completion of his deputation. Sadakant Shukla has the history of charges of colluding with the Land Mafios. He was sent to Home Ministry as Joint Secretary but instead of indulging in law and order, he allegedly got engaged in the business of construction for alleged profit making. read full story at http://upcpri.blogspot.in/2013/04/why-akhilesh-yadav-has-shown-special.html

Issue of guidelines regarding Implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of RTI Act, 2005 –OFFICE MEMORANDUM No.1/6/2011-IR :Department of Personnel & Training Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions Government of India North Block, New Delhi Dated the 15th April, 2013 get complete text at given link http://upcpri.blogspot.in/2013/04/implementation-of-suo-motu-disclosure.html

MISC. BENCH No. - 2709 of 2013 Order Date :- 15.4.2013

Chief Justice's Court Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 2709 of 2013 Petitioner :- Suo-Motu In The Matter Of U.P. State Information Commission Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secretary (Appointment) [P.I.L.] Petitioner Counsel :- Suo Motu Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shiva Kirti Singh,Chief Justice Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Arora,J. Heard learned counsel for the State in this public interest litigation. This public interest litigation is a result of suo-motu cognizance taken by this Court of certain facts reported in a Newspaper dated 22nd March, 2013 disclosing as many as eight vacancies out of ten posts of Information Commissioner in the State of Uttar Pradesh. A counter affidavit has been brought on record on behalf of the State of U.P. to explain as to why such a situation has arisen. According to the counter affidavit certain provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005, a Central Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') were under challenge before the Apex Court in the case of Namit Sharma vs. Union of India and the Apex Court by its judgement dated 13th September, 2012, reported in (2013) 1 SCC 745, issued a number of directions in order to make the Act constitutionally valid as well as workable. read full order at given weblink http://upcpri.blogspot.in/2013/04/misc-bench-no-2709-of-2013-order-date.html

Fill all vacant posts of ICs within three months: HC TNN | Apr 17, 2013, 05.08 AM IST

Fill all vacant posts of ICs within three months: HC TNN | Apr 17, 2013, 05.08 AM IST LUCKNOW: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh government to fill vacant posts of information commissioners in the State Information Commission within three months and furnish the report before it. The court will hear the matter after three months. read full story at http://upcpri.blogspot.in/2013/04/fill-all-vacant-posts-of-ics-within.html

The objectionable part of namit sharma order stayed

RP(C) 2309/2012 etc. 1 ITEM NO.7+8+12 COURT NO.8 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 2309 OF 2012 IN W.P(C) 210/2012 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS NAMIT SHARMA Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions, permission to file synopsis and list of dates and office report) AND R.P.(C) NO. 2675/2012 IN W.P.(C) NO. 210/2012 SLP(C) NO. 27347/2012 (With applns. for c/delay in filing counter affidavit, modification, direction, permission to appear and argue in person, recalling the Court's order with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 16/04/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARJAN KUMAR SIKRI For the parties : Mr. Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, ASG Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shweta Gupta, Adv. Ms. Honey Kumari, Adv. Ms. Mallika Ahluwalia, Adv. Mr. Anoopam Prasad, Adv. Mr. T.A. Khan, Adv. Mr. Nizam Pasha, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Adv. Mr. M.S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Ayyam Perumal, Adv. Mr. K. Seshachary, Adv. Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG Mr. Amit Lubhaya, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. RP(C) 2309/2012 etc. 2 Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shweta Singh, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AAG Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. Mr. Satya Narain Shukla, Respondent-in-person UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.NO. 6 in R.P.(C) No. 2309 of 2012 This is an application for stay of the operation of the judgment dated 13th September, 2012 passed in Writ Petition (C) No. 210 of 2012 titled Namit Sharma Vs. Union of India reported as 2013 (1) SCC 745 during the pendency of the Review Petition (C) No. 2309 of 2012 titled Union of India Vs. Namit Sharma. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and we are not inclined to stay the operation of the entire judgment in Namit Sharma Vs. Union of India but we direct that the following directions in sub-paras 108.8 and 108.9 quoted here-in-below shall remain stayed during the pendency of the Review Petition (C) No. 2309 of 2012. 108.8 The Information Commissions at the respective levels shall henceforth work in Benches of two members each. One of them being a 'judicial member', while the other an 'expert member'. The judicial member should be a person RP(C) 2309/2012 etc. 3 possessing a degree in law, having a judicially trained mind and experience in performing judicial functions. A law officer or a lawyer may also be eligible provided he is a person who has practiced law at least for a period of twenty years as on the date of the advertisement. Such lawyer should also have experience in social work. We are of the considered view that the competent authority should prefer a person who is or has been a Judge of the High Court for appointment as Information Commissioners. Chief Information Commissioner at the Centre or State level shall only be a person who is or has been a Chief Justice of the High Court or a Judge of the Supreme Court of India. 108.9 The appointment of the judicial members to any of these posts shall be made 'in consultation' with the Chief Justice of India and Chief Justices of the High Courts of the respective States, as the case may be". We further direct that wherever Chief Information Commissioner is of the opinion that intricate questions of law will have to be decided in a matter coming before the Information Commissioners, he will ensure that the matter is heard by a Bench of which at least one member has knowledge and experience in the field of Law. We make it clear that subject to orders that may be finally passed after hearing the Review Petitions, the competent authority will continue to fill up the vacant posts of Information Commissioners in accordance with the Act and in accordance with the judgment in RP(C) 2309/2012 etc. 4 W.P.(C) No. 210 of 2012 except sub-paras 108.8 and 108.9 which we have stayed. This is to ensure that functioning of the Information Commissioners in accordance with the Act and the Judgment is not affected during the pendency of the Review Petitions. We further make it clear that the Chief Commissioners already functioning will continue to function until the disposal of the Review Petitions. I.A.No. 6 is ordered accordingly. R.P.(C) Nos. 2309, 2675 AND SLP(C) NO. 27347 OF 2012 Heard in part. List together tomorrow as Part-Heard. (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) COURT MASTER (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER

Govt disinterested in RTI meetings? : TOI:LUCKNOW:UTTAR PRADESH : INDIA

http://upcpri.blogspot.in/2013/04/govt-disinterested-in-rti-meetings.html UCKNOW: The Right to Information (RTI) Act has always been in bad shape in UP. The changing regimes have not done much to ameliorate the state of RTI affairs in the state. The biggest proof on that is defunct state of the state-level committee set up to review the implementation of RTI Act in the state. The committee which was constituted on July 7, 2008, and was intended to review the implementation of the Right to Information (RTI) Act has met on only three occasions till now whereas it was supposed to meet monthly/quarterly to take stock of RTI implementation........................................................................................................... read full story and watch relevant papers at weblink http://upcpri.blogspot.in/2013/04/govt-disinterested-in-rti-meetings.html

Uttar Pradesh RTI activists demonstrate ...

urvashi sharma shared an album with you. Uttar Pradesh RTI activists demonstrate  in lucknow dharna sthal opposite legislative assembly ...and 53 more photos. View album Google+ makes sharing on the web more like sharing in real life. Learn more.

Be thoughtful about who you share this email with; anyone can reshare it. You received this message because urvashi sharma shared it with babitasinghindia@gmail.com. Unsubscribe from these emails. You can't reply to this email. View the post to add a comment. Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA

youngest rti activist of india aishwarya ...

urvashi sharma shared an album with you. ...and 64 more photos. View album Google+ makes sharing on the web more like sharing in real life. Learn more.

Be thoughtful about who you share this email with; anyone can reshare it. You received this message because urvashi sharma shared it with babitasinghindia@gmail.com. Unsubscribe from these emails. You can't reply to this email. View the post to add a comment. Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA

Activist seeks info on terror camps, MHA provides Shinde's clarification

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Activist-seeks-info-on-terror-camps-MHA-provides-Shindes-clarification/articleshow/19400886.cms Activist seeks info on terror camps, MHA provides Shinde's clarification Neha Shukla, TNN | Apr 5, 2013, 06.15 PM IST LUCKNOW: In what could be described as a double whammy for the Congress, after Union home minister Sushilkumar Shinde made a U-turn on his comments on Hindu terrorism, the ministry of home affairs did not provide information about terror camps being operated by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Bharatiya Janata Party, when asked under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The ministry, instead, provided the copy of Shinde's clarification and said the "home minister has issued a clarification on February 20, clarifying the position." The political furore over Shinde's comment on BJP and RSS conducting terror camps, though died down after the minister tendered an apology, caused embarrassment to the government. In an RTI response, the ministry denied information. The questions could be irrelevant since the minister has already apologised for his comment. Shinde had said, during Congress' Jaipur conclave, in January, "We have got an investigation report that be it the RSS or BJP, their training camps are promoting Hindu terrorism." He later clarified that he meant saffron and not Hindu terrorism. The comment was strong enough to leave BJP livid, which demanded that the minister either apologise or be sacked. Shinde later backpedalled and retracted his statement by issuing a clarification and also regretting his statement. In January, activist Urvashi Sharma had sought certified copies of all records available with the government based on which the home minister had accused RSS and BJP of conducting terror training camps and promoting "Hindu terrorism", from the PMO. The response which came more than two months after the application was made, said the government has no records available on any of the information sought. The query had also sought certified copies of information on location within India and/or abroad of RSS and BJP terror training camps; certified copies of records available with the government on action taken against BJP and RSS to ban them for running terror training camps; certified copies of prevailing national/international rules/regulations/treaties/ Government Orders as per which "terrorism" has been divided on the basis of religion/caste/creed/sect etc.; certified copies of list and all records available with the government on cases of infiltration and/or insurgency and case wise actions taken by government.

www.awadhprant.com/Admin/data/2013/04/05/...

www.awadhprant.com/Admin/data/2013/04/05/Lucknow/Lucknow/images/page1_09.gif View or comment on urvashi sharma's post » Google+ makes sharing on the web more like sharing in real life. Learn more. Join Google+

You received this message because urvashi sharma shared it with babitasinghindia@gmail.com. Unsubscribe from these emails. You can't reply to this email. View the post to add a comment. Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA

Government Of India Doesn't Have Proof Of Hindu Terrorism 'हिंदू आतंकवाद' के नाम पर बेनकाब हुई भारत सरकार, सामने आया झूठ

Government Of India Doesn't Have Proof Of Hindu Terrorism 'हिंदू आतंकवाद' के नाम पर बेनकाब हुई भारत सरकार, सामने आया झूठ केंद्रीय गृह मंत्री सुशील कुमार शिंदे बीजेपी और आरएसएस पर भले ही आतंक का ट्रेनिंग कैंप चलाने का आरोप लगाते हैं लेकिन भारत सरकार के पास इसे साबित करने के लिए कोई सुबूत नहीं है। इतना ही नहीं, केंद्र सरकार यह भी बताने में विफल रही कि देश में अल्‍पसंख्‍यकों पर अत्याचार की कुल कितनी वारदातें हुई हैं। ये सूचना का अधिकार कानून के तहत मांगी गई सूचना में सामने आया है। आरटीआई कार्यकर्ता उर्वशी शर्मा को दी गई जानकारी में केंद्र सरकार यह भी बताने में विफल रही कि देश में घुसपैठ की कुल कितनी घटनाएं हुईं और विद्रोह कहां-कहां हुआ।.................. read full story at http://upcpri.blogspot.in/2013/04/government-of-india-doesnt-have-proof.html

YAISHWARYAJ Seva Sansthan & UPCPRI Protest for RTI in Lucknow pics

http://upcpri0413.blogspot.in/2013/04/yaishwaryaj-seva-sansthan-upcpri.html